The Changing Context of Congregational Life
We have been immersed in the
work of tracking the changing context of congregational life and ministry and
in walking along side churches to help them adapt to these changes from three
complementary vantage points. First, our theology department teaches students
who are a product of youth ministry. Our interactions with over seven hundred
students (from the STEM, humanities, and professional degree programs) each
year from over seventy denominations and 48 states have given us a window into
the lives of teenagers and emerging adults in the United States, but also the
churches in which they have been formed. For as Kenda Creasy Dean underscores
in her Almost Christian, “the religiosity of American teenagers must be
read primarily as a reflection on their parents’ religious devotion (or lack
thereof) and, by extension, that of their congregations”.[1]
Drawing on her comprehensive research
into the lives and thoughts of religious teenagers, she concludes that the kind
of students we teach in our classrooms echo with astonishing clarity the kind
of formation that they have received from the families and churches in which
they emerged. Second, the teaching and
research we do in the School of Theology and Vocation (SoTV) has given
us a platform to work directly with pastors, lay leaders, and congregants
within our network of influence through ministry enrichment events,
colloquiums, semester-long seminars, theology camps, and round table
discussions that we sponsor. These face-to-face interactions with the frontline
of congregational life have been illuminating and instructive—and as a result
we are constantly evaluating and modifying our teaching to adapt to the
emerging challenges and needs of congregations within our region. In
particular, our Passage Institute for Youth and Theology (generously
supported by the Lilly Endowment) has enabled us to come along side pastors and
congregations as we partner in a common effort to help churches equip a new
generation of Christians to understand and live out their vocation in a world that
has been radically changed in recent years by our technological age. And third,
through our interactions via the Center for Faith and Work (CFW) we have
learned that people long to better understand how their faith is connected with
their work, but increasingly they do not see their churches as a place to learn
this, nor do they see congregational life as an indispensable part of their
calling.[2]
In our engagement with the
frontline of congregational life, we have learned that pastors and lay leaders feel
like the frenetic and distracted ethos of American culture is set against them
and the kind of work they seek to do with their congregations; they feel as
though they are only able to tread water. We have also noted that pastors, lay
leaders, and engaged congregants who feel called to invest in the flourishing
of congregational life feel tired; they have little time for preparation and sustained
reflection on the Scriptures that ought to inform their ministry, and even less
time to understand the complex and rapidly changing context in which they seek
to serve. They want to be fed, need to be feed, but struggle to find space or
trustworthy conversation partners to empower them. They also comment that professional
training and continuing education are the first things to go as they are increasingly
expected to manage programs more than they are to make disciples. Additionally, we have noted that congregational
leaders feel lonely and isolated—both in their own churches, but also with
respect to other churches within their community. Although they have a deep desire
to network with others who are engaged in similar work, they find no
infrastructure in our region that fosters camaraderie. Ultimately, through the
generosity of a Lilly Endowment grant, what we seek to offer these congregations
with the work that comes from the CFW is hospitality—hospitality that gives
them space to recharge, to reflect, to connect, to grow, and to adapt to their
rapidly changing context.
As we listen to these church
leaders that we engage with through our Passage Institute for Youth and
Theology, as we join hands with them in ministry enrichment events on our
campus, and as we listen to and learn from our students at LETU, we have observed
four themes that consistently emerge as challenges facing congregations today. First,
and foremost, there is a profound disconnect between faith and everyday
life, including (but not limited to) work and study. That is to say, we have noted that congregants
increasingly have a hard time understanding how their profession of faith (what
they say and do on Sundays in church) is related to what they do the rest of
the week, whether it is at work, in school, playing sports or music, with
family and friends, or in any other forms of life and play. As Christian Smith
and Kenda Creasy Dean have underscored in their research, most religious teens either
do not understand or do not care to examine carefully what their religious
traditions affirm and why that matters for life.[3]
Creasy Dean provocatively argues that the problem does not seem to be that
“churches are teaching young people badly, but that we are doing an exceedingly
good job of teaching youth what we really believe: namely, that Christianity is
no big deal, that God requires little, that church is… filled with nice people.[4]
This is especially true in East Texas where the default culture is “Christian.”
In many cases, it appears that most congregants feel that the only value they
bring to congregational life is the money they can give to support the church
and its programs. Similarly, pastors often say that they feel ill-equipped to
help congregants connect their faith with their everyday life, that most of
their training had to do with running church programs. As a result, much of
church life feels like trying to sustain programs and activities that only seek
to benefit people for one day of the week, and that one day seems to have
little to do with the rest of the week. We believe that this disconnect between
faith and work (in the broadest sense of the word) is the greatest obstacle to
thriving congregations in our region. Therefore, our most pressing task is
to help congregations understand how the Christian faith informs, undergirds,
supports, and animates engagement in the world. In the SoTV, we refer to this engagement
as vocation. Congregations seem to lack clarity regarding the overarching
mission of God that we have been invited to participate in and the practices
that shape, sustain, and entail that mission. In short, they lack a clear
understanding of their Christian vocation. We have experienced this firsthand both in the
classroom and in our enrichment events for churches in the community. Students
don’t see how their academic work or the careers they are preparing for are
related in any way to their Christian vocation. Church life has been reduced to
either being a good person (moralism) or feeling good about themselves
(therapeutic); faith is seen as an individual or private response to God rather
than a communal or ecclesial responsibility. Pastors feel as though they are
constantly competing with more important things such as sports, hunting, cheer,
or theater. In our experience, congregations are hungry for resources that will
help them better understand their mission and values, but don’t know where to
look, and often need help translating the information in a way that it
understandable in their particular church context.
A second, emerging
challenge is the pervasive and complex impact of technology on the lives
of congregants. This challenge comes in various forms. For example, biomedical
engineering and artificial intelligence raise perplexing questions about ethics
and what it means to be human, and many pastors and congregants feel unprepared
to respond to these challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic has not only exposed our
inability to think critically about the interface between ethics, economics,
science, medicine, and faith, it has exacerbated it. But it is the ubiquity of everyday technology (such
as smart phones and social media) that presents more subtle and profound
challenges for quality of life issues. For example, over the past ten years,
pastors and church leaders have noted a debilitating erosion of the capacity
for sustained attention and attentiveness to the things that really matter such
as spiritual direction and reading.[5]
We are always distracted and never present, and this has significantly degraded
the quality of life in community. Over the past five years we have also noted that
everyday technology has negatively impacted congregants’ ability to read
Scripture and to follow arguments in sermons and other forms of teaching.[6]
We also find that technology is a significant concern for people working with
youth. Based on the workshops that we have presented, parents and pastors are
very interested in learning about the way technology impacts their children but
are unaware and unreflective on the ways it has impacted their own lives. In
our Passage Institute for Youth and Theology, we have been intentional
about helping students, parents, youth pastors, and lay leaders develop new
practices of attentiveness that enable them to reflect upon the influence of technology
in their lives, and to mitigate the negative effects. These practices have been
well received by all who have participated, but more work is to be done.
Additionally, our Faith, Science and Technology Initiative, housed
within the SoTV, enables us to be uniquely positioned as a resource for these
congregations as they seek to adapt new practices that will enable
attentiveness and thriving in community.
Third, for a variety of reasons, congregations
are unable and often unwilling to engage in conflict resolution and
reconciliation. We have learned this firsthand in our Honors College
capstone course, in which we teach a unit on peacemaking. In some cases,
technology, especially social media, has contributed to this tendency. Although
conflict in community is inevitable, and despite the fact that the Christian
faith has resources to mediate such conflicts, congregations seem to be unaware
and/or unwilling to draw upon these resources in order to resolve conflict and
to work towards reconciliation, in part because they do not recognize this to
be foundational to our vocation or calling. This has led to “fight or flight”
responses when conflict emerges; in the face of disagreement, congregants
either engage in destructive communication practices, or they withdraw
emotionally, and in many cases physically by simply going to another church.
Finally, within our region of influence, which is
characterized by racial and socio-economic diversity, and which shares a long history of systemic
racial oppression, congregations struggle with racial discord and
socio-economic inequality. In many cases, congregations perceive a
problem with the way churches are segregated along socio-economic and racial
lines and grieve this reality but feel that there is no path forward. The
spirit is willing, but the imagination for some alternative way of living
together is weak.
The good news about these four
trends, as we will argue in what follows, is that these challenges are not
insurmountable. The fact is that the Christian faith has resources and
practices that can enable congregations to overcome these obstacles. In
reality, these four trends function as opportunities for congregations to
connect their faith in very practical ways with the most pressing needs of the
day. In other words, attending to these four challenges is in fact the very
means by which congregations can better understand their mission and values, to
reclaim their faith—by attending to these challenges through the practices of
their church traditions.
[1] Kenda Creasy Dean, Almost
Christian: what the faith of our teenagers is telling the American church (Oxford
University Press, 2010), 3-4.
[2] For example, see the
provocative essay by Derek Thompson, “Workism Is Making Americans Miserable” (The
Atlantic, February 24, 2019), who argues that increasingly work is becoming
a religion—and it is not delivering on its promises.
[3] Christian Smith, Soul Searching: the
religious and spiritual lives of American teenagers (Oxford University
Press, 2009), 134, 171. Creasy Dean, Almost Christian.
[4] Creasy Dean, Almost Christian, 12.
[5] E.g. Maggie Jackson, Distracted:
Reclaiming our focus in a world of lost attention (Prometheus, 2018).
[6] E.g. Nicholas Carr, The Shallows: what
the internet is doing to our brains (W.W. Norton & Co, 2011).
Comments
Post a Comment