The (Lieben)GOOD LIFE

In his Modern Technology and the Human Future , Craig Gay asks why we have been so accepting of automatic machinery, and why we are not more concerned that modern technological development is trending away from ordinary embodied human existence. How has technology become the metaphysics of the modern age (95)? Gay argues that our uncritical embrace of technology as the means to progress and the good life is the result of a particular way in which we see nature, or the world. Metaphors matter. And in chapter 3, Gay traces the development of a metaphor that has become the way in which humans now conceptualize the world they live in. The metaphor is a machine. We have conceived of the world as a collection of interconnected parts and elements that function in a mechanical fashion. This metaphor has had a radical impact on the way we understand our place in the world, our calling or vocation we might say. If all of life is more or less made of a vast collection of parts and elements ...

In concluding Part 1 of his book, God Freedom, and Human Dignity, Highfield observes that "If we learned about the human condition only from the high-flying rhetoric of the modern self, we would imagine humanity a race of gods. Given only the descriptions of Mirandola, Descartes and Rousseau, beings from another galaxy might imagine human beings as winged creatures in graceful flight, their noble faces shining with cool pride as they survey their broad domain. Their freedom knows no limit, their dignity exceeds all bounds and their power dwarfs all competitors. Ah, but we know the human condition too well for such illusions!...Anxiety, weakness, suffering, sadness, futility and despair mark its path from start to finish" (102). There is an enormous disparity between the inflated self-understanding of the modern self and the reality of the world we have made for ourselves in the modern age, especially with all the technological capabilities at our disposal. I have worked ...

"Do not be conformed to this world,   but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God—what is good and acceptable and perfect."  --Romans 12.2 There are two fundamental assumptions that the Apostle Paul makes in this pivotal passage in Romans. First, he asserts that there is a "Caller", one who has summoned us, commissioned us; one who has a plan or will for us. Embedded in this assumption is responsibility: we are obligated to discern the will of the "Caller", to conform our lives to something outside of ourselves. Though Paul doesn't use the term, he is underscoring that we have a vocation, that is, a responsibility to discern the Voice that calls us (the word vocation comes from the Latin word vocare , which means 'to call') to live in this world in a particular way. The second assumption of this passage is that our vocation is lived out in a context in which we are being directed...

According to the apostle Paul, God is committed to conforming us to the image of His Son (Rom 8.29). Paul does not explicitly develop what he means by this in the rest of his letter, though one could argue that he has Romans 12-16 in mind. And so it raises a question in my mind: what does it look like to be conformed to the image of the Son? I suppose there are a number of ways to explore this question, but I have been challenged by drawing this claim by Paul into conversation with Jesus in his 'high priestly prayer" in John 17. The prayer is astonishingly revealing because it tells us what Jesus was doing before creation: He was delighting in the Father's love. In fact, he states that His glory is the fact that he has been loved before the foundation of the world (John 17.24). What is more, we learn from this prayer in John 17 that Jesus came into the world so that the love with which he has been loved by the Father might be in us (John 17.26). According to Jesus, t...